Blockchain-Based Land Governance in Indonesia: Comparative Lessons for Regulatory Adaptation and Legal Culture
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24843/UJLC.2026.v10.i02.p04Keywords:
Blockchain, Land Governance, Comparative Legal Analysis, Legal Culture, Regulatory AdaptationAbstract
Indonesia’s land governance system continues to face persistent challenges, including fraudulent transactions, fragmented regulation, limited transparency, and declining public trust. Although digitalization initiatives have been introduced, institutional practices and legal culture have not fully adapted to digital governance, while centralized data management and limited legal protection for digital records continue to undermine legal certainty. This study examines the potential of blockchain technology to strengthen Indonesia’s land administration through a comparative legal approach. It compares blockchain implementation in land registration in Georgia, Sweden, and India, while also examining broader blockchain governance frameworks developed in Estonia, the United Arab Emirates, and the European Union to formulate regulatory directions for Indonesia. Using doctrinal and comparative legal analysis supported by interviews with officials from the ATR/BPN, the study finds that blockchain has considerable potential to enhance data integrity, transparency, administrative efficiency, fraud prevention, and legal certainty. However, successful implementation depends not only on technological capability but also on coherent legal reform, institutional readiness, interoperable digital infrastructure, personal data protection, and a supportive legal culture. This study recommends regulatory reforms, including the legal recognition of blockchain-based land records, the creation of a blockchain regulatory sandbox, and alignment with existing land and personal data protection laws. Theoretically, it contributes to the literature by framing blockchain adoption as a legal governance issue influenced by legal culture and institutional readiness, rather than solely by technological capability. In practical terms, it offers a comparative regulatory framework to support Indonesia’s transition to transparent, accountable, and legally certain blockchain-based land governance.
References
Book
De Filippi, Primavera, and Aaron Wright. Blockchain and the Law: The Rule of Code. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2018.
Herian, Robert. Regulating Blockchain: Critical Perspectives in Law and Technology. London: Routledge, 2019.
Rosenbloom, David H., Robert S. Kravchuk, and Richard M. Clerkin. Public Administration: Understanding Management, Politics, and Law in the Public Sector. 9th ed. New York: Routledge, 2022.
Thysse, Wesley. Decentralized Law: The Power of Blockchain to Transform the Broken Legal System. Thysse Publishing, 2025.
Journal Article
Al-Abdullah, Muhammad, Izzat Alsmadi, Ruwaida Al-Abdullah, and Bernie Farkas. “Designing Privacy-Friendly Data Repositories: A Framework for a Blockchain That Follows GDPR.” Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance 22, no. 5–6 (2020): 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-04-2020-0050.
Alting, Husen, Anshar, Basto Daeng Robo, and Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar. “Land Disputes and the Land Mafia Phenomenon in Indonesia: A Critical Analysis.” Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review 5, no. 3 (2025): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.47172/2965-730X.SDGsReview.v5.n03.pe04794
Amri, Fauzi, Poltak Sihombing, and Syahril Efendi. “Blockchain in Land Registry.” Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Matematika dan IPA IKIP Mataram 11, no. 1 (2023): 218–223. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v11i1.6537
Asyiqin, Istaniah Zainal, et al. “The Principle of Self-Submission in Sharia Economic Dispute Resolution: A Critical Examination through Friedman’s Legal System Theory.” Jambura Law Review 7, no. 2 (2025): 390–416. https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v7i2.27075
Bachriadi, Dianto, and Edward Aspinall. “Land Mafias in Indonesia.” Critical Asian Studies 55, no. 3 (2023): 331–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2023.2215261
Bhardwaj, Vrinda, and Trisha Pande. “Land Rights and Digital Revolution in India: Potential and Pitfalls.” SSRN Electronic Journal (January 14, 2022): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4028625
Burns, Anthony Francis, Abbas Rajabifard, and Davood Shojaei. “Undertaking Land Administration Reform: Is There a Better Way?” Land Use Policy 132 (2023): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106824
Castellanos, Arturo, and Raquel Benbunan-Fich. “Digitalization of Land Records: From Paper to Blockchain.” Paper presented at the Thirty-Ninth International Conference on Information Systems, 2018. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329222337_Digitalization_of_Land_Records_From_Paper_to_Blockchain
Chehrehbargh, Fatemeh Jahani, Abbas Rajabifard, Behnam Atazadeh, and Daniel Steudler. “Current Challenges and Strategic Directions for Land Administration System Modernisation in Indonesia.” Journal of Spatial Science 69, no. 4 (2024): 1097–1129. https://doi.org/10.1080/14498596.2024.2360531
Christine, H., K. T. Novelianto, M. Restiawati, H. Y. Jayanti, and A. Afriyadi. “A Study of Permissioned Blockchain-Based Framework for Land Ownership Tracking in Indonesia.” Jurnal Interkom: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmiah Bidang Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi 17, no. 3 (2022): 119–126. https://doi.org/10.35969/interkom.v17i3.258
Gümüş, Öner. “Radbruch Formula and Justice in Tax Law: A Normative Evaluation on ECtHR Judgments.” Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 27, no. 2 (2025): 621–642. https://doi.org/10.26745/ahbvuibfd.1675158
Islam, Siful. “Decentralized vs. Centralized Database Solutions in Blockchain: Advantages, Challenges, and Use Cases.” Global Mainstream Journal of Innovation, Engineering & Emerging Technology 3, no. 4 (2024): 58–68. https://doi.org/10.62304/jieet.v3i04.195
Kaczorowska, Maria. “Blockchain-Based Land Registration: Possibilities and Challenges.” Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology 13, no. 2 (2019): 339–360. https://doi.org/10.5817/MUJLT2019-2-8
Kapoor, Amit, Mark Esposito, and Mukul Anand. “Land Record Management in India.” SSRN Electronic Journal (2024): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4811021
Kaushik, Anjali. “New Technology Interventions Including Blockchain Technology in Land Record and Registry Management in India.” In ICEGOV ’20: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 143–151. New York: ACM, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1145/3428502.3428521
Khan, Shafaq, Mohammed Shael, Munir Majdalawieh, Nishara Nizamuddin, and Mathew Nicho. “Blockchain for Governments: The Case of the Dubai Government.” Sustainability 14, no. 11 (2022): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116576
Kshetri, Nir. “Blockchain as a Tool to Facilitate Property Rights Protection in the Global South: Lessons from India’s Andhra Pradesh State.” Third World Quarterly 43, no. 2 (2022): 371–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2021.2013116
Lazuashvili, Nino, Alex Norta, and Dirk Draheim. “Integration of Blockchain Technology into a Land Registration System for Immutable Traceability: A Casestudy of Georgia.” Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing 361 (2019): 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30429-4_15
Letunggamu, Olfriady, and Rahma Dwi Putranto. “Implications of Blockchain Technology in Civil Transactions: A Review of Legal Aspects.” Pena Justisia 23, no. 1 (2024): 3453–3466. https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v23i3.5175
Monteiro, Maria Darlene Braga Araújo. “Automatização dos Cartórios de Registros de Imóveis na Era da Democracia Digital: A Atuação do Registrador de Imóveis como Garantidor de Direitos em Tempos de Certificação Digital, Metadados e Blockchain.” Brazilian Journal of Development 8, no. 11 (2022): 74962–74981. https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv8n11-284
Naufal, Yamani, and Dian May Syifa. “Responsive Reformulation of Consumer Protection Law in the Digital Era: A Perspective of Lawrence M. Friedman’s Legal System Theory.” Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah, Perundang-Undangan dan Ekonomi Islam 18, no. 1 (2026): 235–252. https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v18i1.13966
Paavo, Johannes, and Rafael Rodríguez-Puentes. “A Systematic Literature Review on Blockchain-Based Titles Registries for Transparent Land Administration.” International Science and Technology Journal of Namibia 17, no. 1 (2025): 67–86. https://journals.unam.edu.na/index.php/ISTJN/article/view/1873
Pratama, Faisal Surya, Adi Sulistiyono, and Hari Purwadi. “Prevention of Double Certificate by Implementing Blockchain.” International Journal of Business, Economics and Law 30, no. 2 (2023): 44–48.
Proskurovska, Anetta, and Sabine Dörry. “The Blockchain Challenge for Sweden’s Housing and Mortgage Markets.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 54, no. 8 (2022): 1569–1585. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X221116896
Radbruch, Gustav. “Statutory Lawlessness and Supra-Statutory Law (1946).” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26, no. 1 (2006): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqi041
Royadu, Swaroopa. “Self-Guide for Purchasing the Land – The Digital India Land Modernization Program [DILRMP].” Jus Corpus Law Journal 3, no. 1 (2022): 1129–1137. https://www.juscorpus.com/journal/issue-1-aug-22/
Semenzin, Silvia, David Rozas, and Samer Hassan. “Blockchain-Based Application at a Governmental Level: Disruption or Illusion? The Case of Estonia.” Policy and Society 41, no. 3 (2022): 386–401. https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puac014
Shang, Qiuyun, and Allison Price. “A Blockchain-Based Land Titling Project in the Republic of Georgia.” Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization 12, no. 3–4 (2019): 72–78. https://doi.org/10.1162/inov_a_00276
Shuaib, Mohammed, Salwani Mohd Daud, Shadab Alam, and Wazir Zada Khan. “Blockchain-Based Framework for Secure and Reliable Land Registry System.” TELKOMNIKA (Telecommunication Computing Electronics and Control) 18, no. 5 (2020): 2560–2571. https://doi.org/10.12928/telkomnika.v18i5.15787
Susilowati, Nur, Mulyani Djakaria, and Ida Nurlinda. “Analisis Prospek Pemberlakuan Sistem Pendaftaran Tanah Publikasi Positif Dan Aspek Kepastian Hukum Pemegang Hak Atas Tanah.” ACTA DIURNAL Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan 4, no. 1 (2020): 52–67. https://doi.org/10.23920/acta.v4i1.257
Suyudi, Prita Miranti. “Blockchain as a Tool for Land Access Redistribution in Indonesia.” Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) 14, no. 3 (2025): 627–652. https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2025.v14.i03.p05
Syaputra, Risky Andes. “Legal Aspects of Digitalization in Land Registration.” Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review 3, no. 3 (2022): 123–130. https://doi.org/10.56371/jirpl.v3i3.92
Syawaludin, Aidil Rezjki Suljztan, and Rinaldi Munir. “Registration of Land and Building Certificate Ownership Using Blockchain Technology.” In 2021 International Conference on ICT for Smart Society (ICISS), 1–7. Bandung, Indonesia: IEEE, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICISS53185.2021.9533191
Thakur, Vinay, et al. “Land Records on Blockchain for Implementation of Land Titling in India.” International Journal of Information Management 52 (2020): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.04.013
Yadav, Amrendra Singh, and Dharmender Singh Kushwaha. “Blockchain-Based Digitization of Land Record through Trust Value-Based Consensus Algorithm.” Peer-to-Peer Networking & Applications 14, no. 6 (2021): 3540–3558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-021-01207-1
Yuris, Rahmat Febria, and Amad Sudiro. “Responsibility of the Head of the National Land Agency for the Issuance of Land Ownership Certificates with Administrative Legal Defects.” Policy, Law, Notary and Regulatory 2, no. 4 (2023): 437–445. https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v2i4.911
News or Magazine Article
Arini, Shafira Cendra. “BPN Selesaikan 90 Kasus Mafia Tanah, Selamatkan Rp 23,38 T.” Detik Finance, December 3, 2025. https://finance.detik.com/infrastruktur/d-8240985/bpn-selesaikan-90-kasus-mafia-tanah-selamatkan-rp-23-38-t
Rao, Umamaheswara. “Andhra Pradesh’s Literacy Rate Goes Up but Gender Divide a Concern.” The Times of India, December 19, 2020. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/visakhapatnam/states-literacy-rate-goes-up-but-gender-divide-a-concern/articleshow/79802446.cms
Rao, V. Kamalakara. “AP Internet Penetration Lower than National Average.” The Times of India, January 12, 2021. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/visakhapatnam/ap-internet-penetration-lower-than-natl-average/articleshow/80219473.cms
Interview
Jaya, Virgo Eresta. “Interview conducted by the Author with the Director General of Survey and Mapping of Land and Spatial Planning, Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency (ATR/BPN), Republic of Indonesia.” April 19, 2026.
Mulyadi. “Interview conducted by the Author with the Head of Data and Information Management Division at the Center for Data and Information on Land, Spatial Planning, and Sustainable Food Agricultural Land (Pusdatin), Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency (ATR/BPN), Republic of Indonesia.” July 1, 2025.
Sari, Noor Puspita. “Interview conducted by the Author with the Head of Sub-Directorate of Maintenance of Land and Spatial Rights, Directorate General of Land Rights Determination and Land Registration, Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency (ATR/BPN), Republic of Indonesia.” April 6, 2026.
Thesis or Dissertation
Comincioli, Luca Mario. “The Role of Blockchain in Improving Land-Users’ Rights (Can Blockchain Solve Corruption Problems in Land Administration in Developing Countries? -The Case of India).” Master’s Thesis, Luiss School of Government, 2021. https://www.ie-ei.eu/Ressources/FCK/image/Theses/2021/Thesis_COMINCIOLI_GEGPA.pdf
Jalakas, Parol. “Blockchain from Public Administration Perspective: Case of Estonia.” Master’s Thesis, Tallin University of Technology, 2018. https://digikogu.taltech.ee/en/Item/5986b490-e330-45b4-af77-011ff60c5712
Pantoja, Renato Guimarães. “Registro de Imóveis em Blockchain à Brasileira: Uma Forma de Implementar a Blockchain Seguindo a Lei de Registros Públicos.” Undergraduate Thesis, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, 2024. https://pantheon.ufrj.br/bitstream/11422/25056/1/RGPantoja-min.pdf
Quan, Dang Anh. “Two Land Registration Systems. The Land Law of Vietnam and of Sweden.” PhD Dissertation, Lund University, 2011. http://www.lu.se/lup/publication/4002141
Legal Documents
Brazil. Civil Code. Law No. 10.406 (2002).
European Union. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the Protection of Natural Persons with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of Such Data, and Repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation).
Georgia. Law on Public Registry No. 5565 (2011).
Georgia. Law on the Improvement of Cadastral Data and the Procedure for Systematic and Sporadic Registration of Rights to Plots of Land within the Framework of the State Project No. 1168 (2021).
Georgia. The Constitution of Georgia No. 2071 (2018).
Republic of Estonia. Digital Signatures Act (2000).
Republic of Estonia. Electronic Communications Act (2004).
Republic of Estonia. Personal Data Protection Act (2007).
Republic of Estonia. Population Register Act (2000).
Republic of Estonia. Public Information Act (2000).
Republic of Indonesia. Law No. 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Agrarian Law.
Republic of Indonesia. Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions.
Republic of Indonesia. Law No. 27 of 2022 concerning Personal Data Protection.
Republic of Indonesia. Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration.
Republic of Indonesia. Government Regulation No. 18 of 2021 concerning Management Rights, Land Rights, Apartment Units, and Land Registration.
Republic of Indonesia. Presidential Decree No. 34 of 2003 concerning National Policy in the Land Sector.
Republic of Indonesia. Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency No. 3 of 2023 concerning the Issuance of Electronic Documents in Land Registration Activities.
Republic of Indonesia. Circular Letter of the Financial Services Authority No. 21/SEOJK.02/2019 concerning the Regulatory Sandbox.
Sweden. Real Property Register Act. SFS 2000:224.
Sweden. The Swedish Land Code. SFS 1970:994.
Other Documents
Indonesian Commission of Corruption Eradication, “Kajian Identifikasi Korupsi Pada Layanan Pertanahan di Kementerian ATR/BPN (Lanjutan).” 2022. https://cms.kpk.go.id/storage/4103/Identifikasi_Korupsi_Pada_Layanan_Pertanahan_Di_Kementerian_ATRBPN-Lanjutan.pdf
Jenik, Ivo, and Schan Duff. “How to Build a Regulatory Sandbox: A Practical Guide for Policy Makers.” CGAP, 2020. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/126281625136122935/pdf/How-to-Build-a-Regulatory-Sandbox-A-Practical-Guide-for-Policy-Makers.pdf
Johansson, Monica. “TS7.12 Regional Experience in the Cadastre-Europe II Land Register in Sweden-Present and Future.” https://www.fig.net/resources/proceedings/fig_proceedings/fig_2002/Ts7-12/TS7_12_johansson.pdf
McMurren, Juliet, Andrew Young, and Stefaan Verhulst. “Case Study: Addressing Transaction Costs Through Blockchain and Identity in Swedish Land Transfers.” GovLab, 2018. https://blockchan.ge/blockchange-land-registry.pdf
Muhire, Heraclitos, Enrico Giansanti, and Isabel Schoultz. “Access to Justice in Sweden.” Global Access to Justice Project, 2020. https://globalaccesstojustice.com/files/national_reports/national-report-sweden.pdf
Patria, Nezar,et al. Satu Dekade Pembangunan Digital Indonesia 2014-2024. Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika, 2024. https://www.komdigi.go.id/berita/artikel/detail/refleksi-satu-dekade-2014-2024-menuju-transformasi-digital-yang-bermakna
Case Law
Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. Decision No. 309 PK/PDT/2021 (May 27, 2021).
Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia. Decision No. 51/PUU-XXIII/2025 (June 26, 2025).
Kupang High Court. Decision No. 217/PDT/2021/PT KPG (February 9, 2021).
Palangkaraya High Court. Decision No. 80/PDT/2021/PT PLK (September 23, 2021).
Website Page
Aarvik, Per. “Anti-Corruption Reforms Have Been Successful in Georgia, but Blockchain Is Stealing the Limelight.” U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre, October 24, 2022. https://www.u4.no/blog/anti-corruption-reforms-successful-in-georgia-blockchain-stealing-limelight
Chowdhury, Sandip. “Without Addressing Legacy Issues, Can Digitising Land Records in India Be a Game Changer?” The Wire, May 18, 2021. https://thewire.in/rights/land-digitisation-ulpin-land-records-legacy-digital-india
Doing Business 2016: Measuring Regulatory Quality and Efficiency. 13th ed. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2016. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/381301468197958823
Dubai Future Councils. Dubai Blockchain Policy. n.d. https://www.digitaldubai.ae/docs/default-source/publications/dubai-blockchain-policy.pdf?sfvrsn=4a4bb396_4
Ease of Doing Business Score and Ease of Doing Business Ranking 2020. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2020. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/2db10c90-db63-5746-a4e3-1bfe264dda7c/content
Nakamoto, Satoshi. “Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System.” Bitcoin.org, 2008. https://bitcoin.org/en/bitcoin-paper
Oktavira, Bernadetha Aurelia. “Mengenal Perbedaan Civil Law dan Common Law.” Hukumonline, October 6, 2023. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/perbedaan-civil-law-dan-common-law-lt58f8174750e97/
Panchapagesan, Venkatesh. “Can Blockchain Solve Land Record Problems?” Mint, April 12, 2018. https://www.livemint.com/Opinion/t60KeJCjKuEkzU9hEC01GI/Can-blockchain-solve-land-record-problems.html
United Arab Emirates Government Portal. “Emirates Blockchain Strategy 2021.” 2021. https://u.ae/en/about-the-uae/strategies-initiatives-and-awards/strategies-plans-and-visions/strategies-plans-and-visions-untill-2021/emirates-blockchain-strategy-2021
Vassil, Kristjan. “Estonian E-Government Ecosystem: Foundation, Applications, Outcomes.” World Development Report 2016 Background Paper, World Bank, 2016. https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/wdr2016/background-papers
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Prita Miranti Suyudi, Irna Nurhayati, Wahyu Yun Santoso (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



