Editorial Process

[EN]

Editorial Process

Jurnal Anestesi dan Terapi Intensif (JATI) follows a rigorous editorial and peer review process to ensure the integrity, quality, and relevance of all published content. The process is managed entirely through the Open Journal Systems (OJS) 3.4 platform.

1. Submission Stage

Authors must submit manuscripts exclusively via the OJS 3.4 online submission system. At this stage, authors are required to:

Complete all metadata fields (title, abstract, keywords, author affiliations, corresponding author details).
Upload the main manuscript file, tables, figures, and supplementary materials.
Provide supporting documents, including ethical approval letters (if applicable), conflict of interest statements, funding disclosures, and cover letters.

Submissions that do not meet these requirements may be returned to authors before processing.

2. Initial Editorial Screening

Upon submission, the Editor-in-Chief or designated Editorial Manager conducts an initial evaluation to verify:

Plagiarism check (using Turnitin or equivalent software; manuscripts with >20% similarity may be returned or rejected).
Compliance with the journal’s scope, author guidelines, and formatting requirements.
Completeness of supporting documents, including ethics approvals and declarations.

Manuscripts failing to meet minimum standards are returned to authors for correction or may be declined at this stage.

3. Assignment to Section Editor

Manuscripts passing the initial screening are assigned by the Editor-in-Chief to a Section Editor, who oversees the peer review process.

4. Peer Review Process

JATI implements a double-blind peer review policy, ensuring that both authors and reviewers remain anonymous.
Each manuscript is evaluated by at least two independent reviewers with expertise relevant to the subject matter.
Reviewers are expected to submit their assessments, structured review forms, and annotated files within 14 days.
Possible review recommendations include: Accept Submission, Minor Revisions, Major Revisions, or Reject Submission.

5. Editorial Decision

The Section Editor consolidates reviewer reports and submits a recommendation to the Editor-in-Chief. Based on the reviewers’ feedback and editorial judgment, the Editor-in-Chief issues one of the following decisions: Accept, Minor Revisions, Major Revisions, or Reject. Decisions are communicated to the authors through OJS, accompanied by detailed reviewer comments and instructions for revision where applicable.

6. Author Revision

If revisions are required:

Authors are expected to resubmit a revised manuscript along with a point-by-point response to reviewers within 7 days (minor revisions) or 14–21 days (major revisions).
Revised manuscripts may be re-evaluated by the original reviewers (in the case of major revisions) or by the editor (for minor revisions).
Failure to resubmit within the specified timeframe may result in the withdrawal of the manuscript.

7. Acceptance and Production

Following final acceptance, manuscripts proceed to the production stage:

Copyediting: Manuscripts are reviewed for grammar, clarity, style, referencing, and adherence to journal standards.
Layout Editing: The article is formatted into the journal’s official style for online publication.
Proofreading: Authors receive page proofs via OJS for final approval. Authors are responsible for carefully reviewing and approving the proofs before publication.

8. Publication

Final articles are assigned a Digital Object Identifier (DOI).
Articles are published online in the assigned issue (February, June, October).
Metadata is deposited for indexing and archiving (e.g. DOAJ, Google Scholar, Garuda, and other services as applicable).
All articles are published Open Access under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license.

9. Post-Publication

Authors and readers may report errors or ethical concerns post-publication. If necessary, the journal will issue corrections, expressions of concern, or retractions in line with COPE guidelines.
Authors may appeal editorial decisions by submitting a reasoned request to the Editor-in-Chief. Appeals will be considered carefully and may involve re-review.

[ID]

Proses Editorial

Jurnal Anestesi dan Terapi Intensif (JATI) menerapkan proses editorial dan telaah sejawat (peer review) yang ketat untuk menjamin integritas, kualitas, dan relevansi setiap naskah yang diterbitkan. Seluruh proses pengelolaan naskah dilakukan melalui platform Open Journal Systems (OJS) 3.4.

1. Tahap Submisi

Penulis wajib mengirimkan naskah melalui sistem OJS 3.4. Pada tahap ini, penulis harus:

Melengkapi seluruh metadata (judul, abstrak, kata kunci, afiliasi penulis, data korespondensi).
Mengunggah berkas utama naskah, tabel, gambar, dan materi tambahan.
Menyertakan dokumen pendukung seperti surat persetujuan etik (jika relevan), pernyataan konflik kepentingan, sumber pendanaan, dan surat pengantar.

Naskah yang tidak memenuhi persyaratan awal dapat dikembalikan kepada penulis sebelum diproses lebih lanjut.

2. Pemeriksaan Awal Editorial

Setelah submisi, Editor-in-Chief atau Manajer Jurnal melakukan pemeriksaan awal untuk memastikan:

Pemeriksaan plagiarisme (menggunakan Turnitin atau perangkat sejenis; naskah dengan tingkat kesamaan >20% dapat dikembalikan atau ditolak).
Kesesuaian dengan ruang lingkup jurnal, pedoman penulisan, dan format.
Kelengkapan dokumen pendukung, termasuk persetujuan etik dan deklarasi penulis.

Naskah yang tidak memenuhi standar minimum dapat ditolak atau dikembalikan untuk diperbaiki.

3. Penugasan ke Editor Bagian

Naskah yang lolos pemeriksaan awal ditugaskan oleh Editor-in-Chief kepada Editor Bagian, yang akan mengelola proses telaah sejawat.

4. Proses Telaah Sejawat (Peer Review)

JATI menerapkan sistem double-blind peer review, di mana identitas penulis dan penelaah dirahasiakan.
Setiap naskah dievaluasi oleh minimal dua orang penelaah independen sesuai bidang keahlian.
Penelaah diharapkan menyelesaikan penilaian dalam waktu 14 hari.
Rekomendasi yang mungkin diberikan: Diterima, Revisi Minor, Revisi Mayor, atau Ditolak.

5. Keputusan Editorial

Editor Bagian merangkum hasil telaah dan memberikan rekomendasi kepada Editor-in-Chief. Berdasarkan masukan penelaah dan pertimbangan editorial, Editor-in-Chief akan memberikan keputusan: Diterima, Revisi Minor, Revisi Mayor, atau Ditolak. Keputusan dan komentar penelaah disampaikan kepada penulis melalui OJS dengan instruksi yang jelas untuk revisi bila diperlukan.

6. Revisi oleh Penulis

Jika revisi diminta:

Penulis harus mengunggah naskah revisi beserta tanggapan terhadap komentar penelaah dalam waktu 7 hari (revisi minor) atau 14–21 hari (revisi mayor).
Revisi mayor dapat ditelaah kembali oleh penelaah, sedangkan revisi minor biasanya diperiksa langsung oleh editor.
Naskah yang tidak direvisi sesuai tenggat waktu dapat dianggap ditarik.

7. Penerimaan dan Produksi

Setelah naskah dinyatakan diterima, proses produksi dilakukan:

Copyediting: Penyuntingan bahasa, gaya, sitasi, dan struktur naskah.
Layout Editing: Artikel diformat sesuai gaya jurnal untuk versi final PDF.
Proofreading: Versi bukti (proof) dikirim kepada penulis melalui OJS untuk persetujuan akhir sebelum publikasi.

8. Publikasi

Artikel final diberikan Digital Object Identifier (DOI).
Artikel dipublikasikan secara daring pada edisi terjadwal (Februari, Juni, Oktober).
Metadata diserahkan untuk pengindeksan dan pengarsipan (misalnya DOAJ, Google Scholar, Garuda, dan lainnya).
Seluruh artikel diterbitkan dengan akses terbuka (Open Access) di bawah lisensi Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0).

9. Pasca-Publikasi

Penulis atau pembaca dapat melaporkan kesalahan atau masalah etika setelah publikasi. Jika diperlukan, jurnal akan menerbitkan koreksi, expression of concern, atau pencabutan artikel sesuai pedoman COPE.
Penulis berhak mengajukan banding atas keputusan editorial dengan memberikan permintaan yang beralasan kepada Editor-in-Chief. Banding akan ditinjau dengan seksama dan dapat melibatkan telaah ulang.

Editorial Process