Review Process and Policy

[EN]

Review Process and Policy

Review Model

Jurnal Anestesi dan Terapi Intensif (JATI) implements a double-blind peer review system in which the identities of both authors and reviewers are kept confidential throughout the review process. This policy ensures objectivity, fairness, and independence in the assessment of manuscripts.

Reviewer Selection

Reviewers are selected based on their expertise, academic qualifications, and publication track record relevant to the submitted manuscript. The Editorial Board maintains a database of qualified reviewers and may invite external experts when necessary. All reviewers must declare any conflicts of interest prior to accepting a review assignment.

Review Process

  1. Initial Check: After submission, manuscripts undergo an editorial screening for plagiarism, scope, formatting, and ethical compliance. Manuscripts that fail to meet basic requirements are returned to authors or declined.

  2. Assignment: Manuscripts passing the initial check are assigned to a Section Editor, who selects at least two independent reviewers.

  3. Peer Review: Reviewers provide structured evaluations, including recommendations and constructive comments, within 14 days.

  4. Editorial Decision: Based on reviewer reports, the Editor-in-Chief or Section Editor issues one of the following decisions:

    • Accept

    • Minor Revisions

    • Major Revisions

    • Reject

  5. Revisions: Authors must submit revised manuscripts and a detailed response to reviewers within the specified deadline. Revised manuscripts may undergo re-review if necessary.

  6. Final Decision: The Editor-in-Chief makes the final decision on acceptance.

Reviewer Responsibilities

  • Provide objective, constructive, and timely feedback.

  • Maintain confidentiality of the manuscript and review process.

  • Identify any ethical concerns, plagiarism, or data manipulation.

  • Decline reviews if conflicts of interest exist or if expertise is insufficient.

Author Responsibilities

  • Respond to reviewer comments point by point and revise the manuscript accordingly.

  • Ensure that revisions are highlighted or tracked to facilitate evaluation.

  • Adhere to the timelines given for revisions (7 days for minor, 14–21 days for major).

Editorial Responsibilities

  • Ensure fair and unbiased review, free from discrimination.

  • Mediate between reviewers and authors when necessary.

  • Act in accordance with COPE flowcharts in cases of suspected misconduct.

Appeals and Complaints

Authors may appeal editorial decisions by submitting a detailed justification to the Editor-in-Chief. Appeals will be reviewed by the Editorial Board, and where appropriate, an independent reviewer may be consulted. Complaints regarding the review process will be handled transparently and in line with COPE recommendations.

Confidentiality

All manuscripts, reviewer reports, and editorial communications are treated as confidential documents. Information will not be shared outside the editorial process without explicit permission from the author(s).

 

[ID]

Proses dan Kebijakan Telaah Sejawat (Review Process and Policy)

Model Telaah

Jurnal Anestesi dan Terapi Intensif (JATI) menerapkan sistem telaah sejawat ganda buta (double-blind peer review), di mana identitas penulis dan penelaah dirahasiakan sepanjang proses. Kebijakan ini bertujuan untuk menjamin objektivitas, keadilan, dan independensi dalam penilaian naskah.

Pemilihan Penelaah

Penelaah dipilih berdasarkan keahlian, kualifikasi akademik, serta rekam jejak publikasi yang relevan dengan naskah yang diajukan. Dewan Editorial memelihara basis data penelaah berkualitas dan dapat mengundang pakar eksternal jika diperlukan. Semua penelaah wajib menyatakan adanya potensi konflik kepentingan sebelum menerima penugasan telaah.

Proses Telaah

  1. Pemeriksaan Awal: Setelah submisi, naskah disaring oleh editor untuk memeriksa plagiarisme, kesesuaian ruang lingkup, format, dan kepatuhan etik. Naskah yang tidak memenuhi syarat dasar dikembalikan atau ditolak.

  2. Penugasan: Naskah yang lolos pemeriksaan awal ditugaskan kepada Editor Bagian, yang kemudian memilih minimal dua penelaah independen.

  3. Telaah Sejawat: Penelaah memberikan evaluasi terstruktur, termasuk rekomendasi dan komentar konstruktif, dalam waktu 14 hari.

  4. Keputusan Editorial: Berdasarkan laporan penelaah, Editor-in-Chief atau Editor Bagian memberikan keputusan:

    • Diterima

    • Revisi Minor

    • Revisi Mayor

    • Ditolak

  5. Revisi: Penulis wajib mengirimkan naskah revisi dan tanggapan rinci terhadap komentar penelaah sesuai tenggat waktu (7 hari untuk revisi minor, 14–21 hari untuk revisi mayor). Naskah revisi dapat ditelaah kembali bila diperlukan.

  6. Keputusan Akhir: Keputusan akhir penerimaan artikel ditetapkan oleh Editor-in-Chief.

Tanggung Jawab Penelaah

  • Memberikan umpan balik yang objektif, konstruktif, dan tepat waktu.

  • Menjaga kerahasiaan naskah dan proses telaah.

  • Melaporkan dugaan masalah etika, plagiarisme, atau manipulasi data.

  • Menolak penugasan jika terdapat konflik kepentingan atau keahlian tidak memadai.

Tanggung Jawab Penulis

  • Menyediakan tanggapan poin demi poin terhadap komentar penelaah serta merevisi naskah sesuai masukan.

  • Menyertakan revisi yang ditandai atau ditrack untuk memudahkan evaluasi.

  • Mematuhi tenggat waktu yang ditentukan.

Tanggung Jawab Editor

  • Menjamin telaah sejawat dilakukan secara adil, obyektif, dan bebas diskriminasi.

  • Memediasi komunikasi antara penelaah dan penulis bila diperlukan.

  • Bertindak sesuai alur kerja COPE dalam kasus dugaan pelanggaran etika.

Banding dan Keluhan

Penulis berhak mengajukan banding atas keputusan editorial dengan menyertakan justifikasi rinci kepada Editor-in-Chief. Banding akan ditinjau oleh Dewan Editorial, dan bila diperlukan, melibatkan penelaah independen. Keluhan terkait proses telaah akan ditangani secara transparan sesuai rekomendasi COPE.

Kerahasiaan

Seluruh naskah, laporan penelaah, dan komunikasi editorial diperlakukan sebagai dokumen rahasia. Informasi tidak akan dibagikan di luar proses editorial tanpa izin eksplisit dari penulis.