Efektivitas dan Keamanan Deksmedetomidine Nebulisasi Dibandingkan Rute Intravena sebagai Premedikasi Anestesi: Tinjauan Naratif

Authors

  • Ida Katarina Udayana University Author
  • I Putu Fajar Narakusuma Universitas Udayana Author
  • Made Septyana Parama Adi Udayana University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24843/93296c76

Keywords:

Bradikardia, Dexmedetomidine, Hipotensi, Laringoskopi, Nebulisasi, Respon Hemodinamik

Abstract

Laringoskopi dan intubasi trakea merupakan prosedur rutin anestesi yang sering memicu respons hemodinamik berupa peningkatan tekanan darah dan denyut jantung, yang dapat berisiko pada pasien dengan komorbiditas kardiovaskular atau serebrovaskular. Deksmedetomidine, agonis reseptor α2 adrenergik selektif, terbukti efektif dalam menekan respon tersebut melalui efek simpatolitik dan sedatif. Namun, pemberian intravena sering menyebabkan efek samping berupa hipotensi dan bradikardia. Tinjauan naratif ini bertujuan membandingkan efektivitas dan profil keamanan deksmedetomidine nebulisasi dengan rute intravena sebagai agen premedikasi untuk mengontrol respon hemodinamik selama laringoskopi dan intubasi. Berdasarkan hasil sintesis, deksmedetomidine nebulisasi mampu menurunkan lonjakan tekanan darah dan denyut jantung secara efektif dengan insidensi hipotensi dan bradikardi yang lebih rendah dibandingkan pemberian intravena, serta mengurangi kebutuhan obat induksi anestesi tanpa menimbulkan komplikasi serius. Dengan demikian, deksmedetomidine nebulisasi berpotensi menjadi alternatif premedikasi yang efektif dan lebih aman untuk stabilisasi hemodinamik selama anestesi, meskipun masih diperlukan uji klinis multisenter berskala besar untuk memperkuat bukti dan menentukan dosis optimal.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Gauchan, S. & Thapa, C. Comparative Study of Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl for Attenuation of Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Intubation. J. Coll. Med. Sci. 15, 191–196 (2019).

2. Singla, A., Saraswat, R. K., Bharadwaj, A. & Singh, S. Nebulized Versus Intravenously Administered Dexmedetomidine for Obtunding Hemodynamic Responses to Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation: A Randomized Double-Blind Comparative Study. Cureus (2024) doi:10.7759/cureus.54768.

3. Shankar, K., Rangalakshmi, S., Kailash, P. & Priyanka, D. Comparison of Hemodynamics and Opioid Sparing Effect of Dexmedetomidine Nebulization and Intravenous Dexmedetomidine in Laparoscopic Surgeries Under General Anesthesia. Asian J. Anesthesiol. 60, 33–40 (2022).

4. Shrivastava, P. et al. Evaluation of Nebulised Dexmedetomidine Given Pre-operatively to Attenuate Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation: A Randomised Control Trial. Cureus 14, e25223 (2022).

5. Abdelraheem, T. M., Hendawy, H. A. & Elkeblawy, A. M. Intranasal Dexmedetomidine versus Intranasal Midazolam as Sole Sedative Agents for Pelviabdominal Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Pediatrics: A Randomized Double-Blind Trial. Bali J. Anesthesiol. 7, 99–104 (2023).

6. Ittoop, A. et al. Reduction in postoperative sore throat by preoperative nebulization with dexmedetomidine, ketamine or saline: A prospective, randomized‑controlled trial. J. Anaesthesiol. Clin. Pharmacol. 39, 201–207 (2023).

7. Kumar, N. R. R., Jonnavithula, N., Padhy, S., Sanapala, V. & Naik, V. V. Evaluation of nebulised dexmedetomidine in blunting haemodynamic response to intubation: A prospective randomised study. Indian J. Anaesth. 64, 874–879 (2020).

8. Gupta, M. et al. Nebulized dexmedetomidine for attenuating hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation in adult patients undergoing surgeries under general anaesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Anesthesiol. 23, 406 (2023).

9. Bonagua, D. M., Crisostomo, H. C., Hernandez, A. G. C. & Brodit, S. E. Bonagua et al. Dexmedetomidine and intravenous access in pediatric patients The effect of dexmedetomidine nebulization as a premedication prior to peripheral intravenous access in pediatric patients and its effect on separation anxiety score and acceptance to intrave-nous cannulation score. Pediatr. Anesth. Crit. Care J. 8, 120–128 (2020).

10. Carnet Le Provost, K., Kepp, O., Kroemer, G. & Bezu, L. Trial watch: dexmedetomidine in cancer therapy. Oncoimmunology 13, 1–17 (2024).

11. Nagashima, J. K. et al. Microcirculation assessment of dexmedetomidine constant rate infusion during anesthesia of dogs with sepsis from pyometra: a randomized clinical study. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 49, 536–545 (2022).

12. Singh, V., Pahade, A. & Mowar, A. Comparison of Intravenous Versus Nebulized Dexmedetomidine for Laryngoscopy and Intubation-Induced Sympathoadrenal Stress Response Attenuation. Anesthesiol. Pain Med. 12, (2022).

13. Gu, W., Xu, M., Lu, H., Huang, Q. & Wu, J. Nebulized dexmedetomidine-lidocaine inhalation as a premedication for flexible bronchoscopy: A randomized trial. J. Thorac. Dis. 11, 4663–4670 (2019).

14. Sheth, D. P. A., Hathiwala, D. H. & Shah, D. D. Effect of dexmedetomidine by nebulizer for blunting stress response to direct laryngoscopy and intubation. Int. J. Med. Anesthesiol. 4, 76–80 (2021).

15. Gandhi, M., Singh, S., Agrawal, A. & Arora KK. Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of nebulized dexmedetomidine V/S intravenous dexmedetomidine in blunting hemodynamic response to intubation – A prospective and randomized study. Asian J. Med. Sci. 14, 47–51 (2023).

16. Chaudhary, A. et al. A randomized comparative study of preoperative fentanyl and dexmedetomidine nebulization on the hemodynamic response to endotracheal intubation. Natl. J. Physiol. Pharm. Pharmacol. 13, 1 (2023).

17. Shafa, A., Habibzadeh, M., Shetabi, H. & Aghil, A. Comparing the hemodynamic effects of nebulized dexmedetomidine and nebulized lidocaine in children undergoing fiberoptic bronchoscopy. J. Adv. Med. Biomed. Res. 27, 14–19 (2019).

18. Lin, J. et al. The Sedative Effects of Inhaled Nebulized Dexmedetomidine on Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Pediatrics vol. 10 at https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.865107 (2022).

19. Zha, J. et al. Nebulized Dexmedetomidine Alleviates Oxidative Stress in Ventilator-induced Lung Injury via Keap1-Nrf2-ARE Pathway. Iran. J. Allergy, Asthma Immunol. 23, 330–338 (2024).

20. Reshma, B. M. et al. A comparative evaluation of nebulised and IV dexmedetomidine on attenuation of haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy. Int. J. Life Sci. 13, (2024).

JATIissue3

Downloads

Published

01-12-2025

Data Availability Statement

Tidak ada data baru yang dihasilkan atau dianalisis dalam studi ini.

Issue

Section

Review Articles

How to Cite

Efektivitas dan Keamanan Deksmedetomidine Nebulisasi Dibandingkan Rute Intravena sebagai Premedikasi Anestesi: Tinjauan Naratif. (2025). Jurnal Anestesiologi Dan Terapi Intensif, 1(3), 118-125. https://doi.org/10.24843/93296c76

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.