Diaphragm Thickening Fraction vs Rapid Shallow Breathing Index in Predicting Weaning Success: A Prospective Diagnostic Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24843/bnr74z53Keywords:
Diaphragm, Intensive Care Units, Mechanical Ventilation, Ultrasonography, ventilator weaningAbstract
Introduction: Weaning from mechanical ventilation is a critical step in intensive care, and inaccurate assessment may increase the risk of complications. The rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) is widely used to evaluate weaning readiness but does not directly assess diaphragmatic function. Diaphragm thickening fraction (DTF), measured by bedside ultrasound, has been proposed as an additional predictor of weaning success. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of DTF and RSBI in mechanically ventilated ICU patients.
Patients and Methods: This prospective diagnostic accuracy study was conducted in a tertiary hospital in Denpasar, Indonesia, from September to December 2022, in accordance with STARD 2015 guidelines. Adult patients aged 18–65 years who received invasive mechanical ventilation for >24 hours and were considered ready for weaning were included. RSBI and right-sided DTF were measured at the fifth minute of a spontaneous breathing trial. Weaning success was defined as extubation without reintubation, noninvasive ventilation, or death within 48 hours.
Results: Fifty-six patients were included, of whom 73.2% achieved successful weaning. DTF demonstrated high sensitivity (95.4%) and moderate specificity (75.0%), with a positive predictive value of 93.3% and a negative predictive value of 81.8%. RSBI showed sensitivity of 97.5% and specificity of 80.0%, with higher discriminative performance (AUC 0.88 vs 0.79). Confidence intervals and statistical comparisons between AUCs were not performed.
Conclusion: Both RSBI and DTF were associated with weaning success. RSBI demonstrated superior overall diagnostic performance and remains the primary assessment tool. DTF may provide additional physiological information on diaphragmatic function and serve as a complementary parameter during weaning assessment.
Downloads
References
1. Tobin MJ. Assessment and technique of weaning. In: Webb A, Angus DC, Finfer S, Gattinoni L, Singer M, eds. Oxford Textbook of Critical Care. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2016:471-473.
2. Beduneau G, Pham T, Schortgen F, et al. Epidemiology of weaning outcome according to a new definition the WIND study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;195(6):772-783. doi:10.1164/rccm.201602-0320OC
3. Yang KL, Tobin MJ. A Prospective Study of Indexes Predicting The Outcome of Trial of Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:1072-1077.
4. Karthika M, Al Enezi FA, Pillai L V., Arabi YM. Rapid shallow breathing index. Ann Thorac Med. 2016;11(3):167-176. doi:10.4103/1817-1737.176876
5. Duarte H, França DLG, Portes MCF, et al. Comparison of different methods of obtaining the rapid shallow breathing index. Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English Edition). 2022;(xx). doi:10.1016/j.bjane.2021.05.001
6. Pirompanich P, Romsaiyut S. Use of diaphragm thickening fraction combined with rapid shallow breathing index for predicting success of weaning from mechanical ventilator in medical patients. J Intensive Care. 2018;6(1):1-7. doi:10.1186/s40560-018-0277-9
7. Jati SW, Aditianingsih D, George Y, Risadayanti R. Effect of hemoglobin levels on the success of weaning and extubation processes in critical patients with mechanical ventilation: a systematic review. Bali Journal of Anesthesiology. 2023;7(4):197. doi:10.4103/bjoa.bjoa_263_22
8. Turton P, Alaidarous S, Welters I. A narrative review of diaphragm ultrasound to predict weaning from mechanical ventilation: where are we and where are we heading? Crit Ultrasound J. 2019;11(1). doi:10.1186/s13089-019-0117-8
9. Alam MJ, Roy S, Iktidar MA, et al. Diaphragm ultrasound as a better predictor of successful extubation from mechanical ventilation than rapid shallow breathing index. Acute and Critical Care. 2022;37(1):94-100. doi:10.4266/ACC.2021.01354
10. Santana PV, Cardenas LZ, de Albuquerque ALP, de Carvalho CRR, Caruso P. Diaphragmatic ultrasound: A review of its methodological aspects and clinical uses. Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia. 2020;46(6):1-17. doi:10.36416/1806-3756/e20200064
11. Banerjee A, Mehrotra G. Comparison of lung ultrasound-based weaning indices with rapid shallow breathing index: Are they helpful? Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine. 2018;22(6):435-440. doi:10.4103/ijccm.IJCCM_331_17
12. Kilaru D, Panebianco N, Baston C. Diaphragm Ultrasound in Weaning from Mechanical Ventilation. Chest. 2021;159(3):1166-1172. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2020.12.003
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to patient confidentiality and ethical restrictions, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Deif Tunggal, I Gusti Ngurah Mahaalit Aribawa, Dewa Ayu Mas Shintya Dewi (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share, use, distribute, and reproduce the work in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
